Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:48

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Obituary for Alan A Hines - holcombefuneralhomes.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Shared Genetic Signatures Found Across Psychiatric Disorders - Neuroscience News
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Stolen iPhones disabled by Apple's anti-theft tech after Los Angeles looting - TechSpot
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
What can you do if you are a full-grown adult, but never experienced being a child?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Deion Sanders gives update on health issues that have kept him home - New York Post
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Can Scale AI and Alexandr Wang reignite Meta’s AI efforts? - TechCrunch